Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

State v. Morris

State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
64 Ohio St. 3d 1204; 592 N.E.2d 1389

State v. Morris

Opinion of the Court

This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. I would allow this matter in on motion and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.