Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 13, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

64 Ohio St. 3d 1206; 595 N.E.2d 941; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1947

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz (Ohio 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Gregory G. Spitz, Attorney Registration No. 0000794.

*1207The court coining now to consider its order of December 11, 1991, suspending respondent, Gregory G. Spitz, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), now Section (6)(B), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10) (formerly Section 24).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED by the court that Gregory G. Spitz be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Spitz (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 178, 580 N.E.2d 1071.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.