Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

State ex rel. Jackson v. Lanzinger

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

65 Ohio St. 3d 132; 601 N.E.2d 36; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2742

Opinion of the Court

*133The cause is affirmed for the reason stated in the court of appeals’ opinion which denied appellant’s complaint in mandamus for a copy of the transcript of his trial proceedings that “a true and accurate copy of the transcript of proceedings was [already] provided” to him.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.