Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Bloss v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

65 Ohio St. 3d 145; 602 N.E.2d 602; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2897

Cases that cite this one

148 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Limpach v. Lane, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
Brown v. Rogers (Ohio 1995)
Robinson v. Miller (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
Hughley v. Saunders, 09 Ca 6 (3-6-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
Brown v. Rogers (Ohio 1995)
Goodykoontz v. Harris (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
Smith v. Buchanan (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
State ex rel. Callahan v. Eppinger (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
Payne v. LaRose (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
State ex rel. Miller v. May, Warden (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
State ex rel. Thomas v. Miller (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
Smith v. Buchanan (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Gephart v. Miller (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
Wilson v. Miller (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
Thomas v. Eberlin, 08 Be 14 (9-8-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
LaVette v. Grice (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
Billman v. Meintel (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
Smith v. Lucas (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
Hargrove v. Bobby (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
Tayse v. Erdos (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
Small v. Collins (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
Farley v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2021)
State ex rel. Hunter v. Clipper (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
Young v. Foley (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
Midgett v. Warden, Belmont Corr. Inst. (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant claims it is unconstitutional to revoke a mentally ill person’s parole for violations caused by his mental illness. The court of appeals reached the correct conclusion when it dismissed appellant’s complaint *146for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). These commitment papers are necessary for a complete understanding of the petition. Without them, the petition is fatally defective. When a petition is presented to a court that does not comply with R.C. 2725.04(D), there is no showing of how the commitment was procured and there is nothing before the court on which to make a determined judgment except, of course, the bare allegations of petitioner’s application. In re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Wells (Jan. 27, 1984), Lucas App. No. L-84-015, unreported, 1984 WL 4214.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.