Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
65 Ohio St. 3d 160; 602 N.E.2d 610; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑