Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

In re Nicotera

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

65 Ohio St. 3d 163; 602 N.E.2d 612; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3110

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pickrel (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

When an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Ohio is disciplined by another jurisdiction, Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4) requires this court to “impose the identical or comparable discipline imposed in the other jurisdiction * * unless the attorney proves by clear and convincing evidence that such discipline would be unwarranted. Nicotera has not done so. Moreover, his inactive status in Ohio does not preclude discipline. Accordingly, Thomas C. Nicotera is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.