Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

State ex rel. White v. Enright

State ex rel. White v. Enright
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 11, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
65 Ohio St. 3d 481; 605 N.E.2d 44

State ex rel. White v. Enright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Appellant ignored two notices from the court of appeals to file his brief, and ignored the first notice for more than two months. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution under these facts.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.