Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 24, 1993 · Douglas, Impose, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Suspension, Sweeney, Wright
66 Ohio St. 3d 4; 607 N.E.2d 438
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. After the first year of the suspension is completed, respondent shall be placed on monitored probation for the balance of the sanction. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would impose an indefinite suspension on respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.