Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

State ex rel. Dotson v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 24, 1993 · No. 92-1603 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

66 Ohio St. 3d 25; 607 N.E.2d 453

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

Hopkins v. State, 89647 (4-16-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Ganim v. Ganim, Unpublished Decision (5-26-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
In re C.F. v. Cuyahoga C. Dept., H./ch., Unpublished Decision (1-27-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Palmer v. Rose, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Ross v. Kinkela, Unpublished Decision (11-15-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
Palmer v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State Ex Rel. Fryerson v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (6-1-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State Ex Rel Tomajko v. Warden, House, Unpublished Decision (4-3-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
Limpach v. Lane, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State ex rel. Brantley v. Anderson (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Brantley v. Anderson (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (Ohio 1994)
Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc. (Ohio 1994)
Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc. (Ohio 1994)
State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (Ohio 1994)
State v. Gansheimer, 2007-A-0042 (9-28-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Johnson v. Bobby, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Tillis v. Gansheimer, Unpublished Decision (3-7-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Tate v. Bernard, Unpublished Decision (11-21-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
Robinson v. Haskins, Unpublished Decision (6-7-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

In Mack v. Maxwell (1963), 174 Ohio St. 275, 22 O.O.2d 335, 189 N.E.2d 156, we held that a claimed denial of the constitutional right of a speedy trial could not be brought in habeas corpus after the accused had pled guilty to or been convicted of the crime charged. In McConnaughy v. Alvis (1956), 165 Ohio St. 102, 59 O.O. 103, 133 N.E.2d 133, we held that ineffective assistance of *26trial counsel is a nonjurisdictional claim that must be raised by appeal. Therefore, the court of appeals correctly dismissed the petition in this case, and its judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.