State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers, 66 Ohio St. 3d 36 (Ohio 1993)
607 N.E.2d 461
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. In In re Hunt (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 378, 75 O.O.2d 450, 348 N.E.2d 727, paragraph two of the syllabus, we held that “[a] writ of habeas corpus will ordinarily be denied where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” An order revoking probation and imposing sentence is a final, appealable order from which an appeal is routinely taken. See, e.g., State v. McMullen (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 244, 6 OBR 312, 452 N.E.2d 1292; State v. Walden (1988), 54 Ohio App.3d 160, 561 N.E.2d 995.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers, Warden
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published