State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers, 66 Ohio St. 3d 36 (Ohio 1993)
607 N.E.2d 461
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. In In re Hunt (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 378, 75 O.O.2d 450, 348 N.E.2d 727, paragraph two of the syllabus, we held that “[a] writ of habeas corpus will ordinarily be denied where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” An order revoking probation and imposing sentence is a final, appealable order from which an appeal is routinely taken. See, e.g., State v. McMullen (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 244, 6 OBR 312, 452 N.E.2d 1292; State v. Walden (1988), 54 Ohio App.3d 160, 561 N.E.2d 995.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers, Warden
Cited By
8 cases
Status
Published