State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Coe v. McFaul, 89749 (5-1-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- State v. Russell, 89639 (4-4-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- Perry v. State, Unpublished Decision (10-12-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- State Ex Rel. McGrath v. Gilligan, Unpublished Decision (2-16-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Saffell v. Carter, Unpublished Decision (12-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State ex rel. Gadsden v. Lioi (Ohio 2001)
- State ex rel. Gadsden v. Lioi (Ohio 2001)
- Garner v. Chaudhry, Unpublished Decision (8-28-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. In In re Hunt (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 378, 75 O.O.2d 450, 348 N.E.2d 727, paragraph two of the syllabus, we held that “[a] writ of habeas corpus will ordinarily be denied where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” An order revoking probation and imposing sentence is a final, appealable order from which an appeal is routinely taken. See, e.g., State v. McMullen (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 244, 6 OBR 312, 452 N.E.2d 1292; State v. Walden (1988), 54 Ohio App.3d 160, 561 N.E.2d 995.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.