Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court March 3, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams, 66 Ohio St. 3d 41 (Ohio 1993)

Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4), and further agree that respondent’s unique psychological history is sufficiently mitigating to warrant the sanction of indefinite suspension. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Reference

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published