Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright
66 Ohio St. 3d 41

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4), and further agree that respondent’s unique psychological history is sufficiently mitigating to warrant the sanction of indefinite suspension. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑