State ex rel. Henneke v. Davis
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Berry-Silverman v. Silverman (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
- Messenger v. Carper (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- In re P.A.R. (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
- Carow v. Girton (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
- McDonald v. McDonald (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- Montgomery v. Montgomery, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
- In re Parker (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
- Price v. Price (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. DeWine v. Walker (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- Burkett v. Hickman (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- Ward v. Ward (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- Humbert v. Borkowski, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s motion, by which he seeks to preserve and enforce his claimed rights under the appellate court’s order issued in 1985, is for civil contempt. See State v. Local Union No. 5760 (1961), 172 Ohio St. 75, 82-83, 15 O.O.2d 133, 138, 173 N.E.2d 331, 338; Wellman Eng. Co. v. Calderon Automation, Inc. (1965), 2 Ohio App.2d 385, 31 O.O.2d 591, 209 N.E.2d 172. The purpose of a civil contempt proceeding is remedial in nature, to obtain compliance with a lawful court order for the benefit of the complainant. State v. Local Union No. 5760, supra; Denovchek v. Bd. of Trumbull Cty. Commrs. (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 14, 520 N.E.2d 1362.
In the companion case of Jones, supra, we have already provided the relief appellant seeks: the effective nullification of the clerk’s policy honoring “cash
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.