Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

In re Grossman

In re Grossman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 16, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
66 Ohio St. 3d 372; 613 N.E.2d 180; 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1209

In re Grossman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and adopt its recommendation. The applicant has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law. Neal L. Grossman’s application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law is denied, and he is permanently prohibited from reapplying to take the Ohio bar examination and from reapplying for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.

Application denied.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.