Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 20, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
66 Ohio St. 3d 1207; 607 N.E.2d 8

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

Opinion of the Court

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher J. Baer, Attorney Registration No. 0010166.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 17, 1992, suspending respondent, Christopher J. Baer, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c) (now Rule V[6][B]), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A) (formerly Rule V[24]). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Christopher J. Baer be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

For earlier case, see (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 32, 591 N.E.2d 1209.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.