Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova
Ohio Supreme Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova, 67 Ohio St. 3d 25 (Ohio 1993)
615 N.E.2d 1035
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova
Opinion of the Court
We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, we differ with the board’s recommendation. We order instead that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I would follow the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months suspended upon condition that respondent not be found in violation of any other Disciplinary Rules for three years.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published