Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

State ex rel. Lowery v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 11, 1993 · No. 92-1556 · Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

67 Ohio St. 3d 126; 616 N.E.2d 233; 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1576

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

State Ex Rel. Moyer v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
State v. Campbell (Ohio 2000)
State v. Vandergriff (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
Bank of New York Mellon v. Huth (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Todd Development Co. v. Morgan (Ohio 2008)
State ex rel. J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. Warner (Ohio 2004)
Templeton v. Sheets, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
Entenman v. Auto-Owners Insurance (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State v. Campbell (Ohio 2000)
State ex rel. Newell v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Newell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Ohio 1997)
State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler (Ohio 1996)
State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler (Ohio 1996)
State v. Ealy (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Edgbarton Investment v. Target Expediting, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State Ex Rel. Bothwell v. Bothwell, Unpublished Decision (8-6-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Here, the city submitted the records for in camera inspection, presented evidence and argument to support its claimed exemptions to public release, and asked the court to decide the issues. Under the circumstances, the city cannot now claim it lacked a fair opportunity to present evidence to support its claimed exemptions.

We agree that public officials must be given an adequate opportunity to present evidence about claimed exemptions. “A governmental body refusing to *128release records has the burden of proving that the records are excepted from disclosure by R.C. 149.43.” State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 79, 526 N.E.2d 786, paragraph two of the syllabus. Moreover, exemptions to the release of records may not be self-evident on a document’s face, and courts regularly rely upon other evidence to decide exemptions. See, generally, State ex rel. McGee v. Ohio State Bd. of Psychology (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 59, 550 N.E.2d 945.

However, the court of appeals decided the case only after the city submitted the disputed documents to the court, asserted exemptions, and asked the court to decide the issues on the basis of an in camera inspection of the documents. See State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland, supra, at paragraph four of the syllabus. Since the court did as the city asked, the city cannot complain now about the lack of opportunity to present evidence. As we reaffirmed in Center Ridge Ganley, Inc. v. Stinn (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 310, 313, 31 OBR 587, 590, 511 N.E.2d 106, 109, “[u]nder the ‘invited error’ doctrine, ‘[a] party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.’ Lester v. Leuck (1943), 142 Ohio St. 91, 26 O.O. 280, 50 N.E.2d 145, paragraph one of the syllabus.”

Thus, the court’s summary judgment for relator neither prejudiced the city’s procedural rights nor denied the city an opportunity to submit evidence. See State ex rel. Cuyahoga Cty. Hosp. v. Bur. of Workers’ Comp. (1986), 27 Ohio St.3d 25, 28, 27 OBR 442, 444, 500 N.E.2d 1370, 1373; Houk v. Ross (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 77, 63 O.O.2d 119, 296 N.E.2d 266, paragraph one of the syllabus. But, see, Marshall v. Aaron (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 48, 15 OBR 145, 472 N.E.2d 335, syllabus.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment only.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.