Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 8, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
67 Ohio St. 3d 238; 617 N.E.2d 677

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissents in part because he would suspend only eighteen months of the two-year suspension.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the suspension stayed upon the conditions set forth in the stipulations and recommended sanction and restitution, and upon the further conditions recommended by the panel. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.