Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 13, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
67 Ohio St. 3d 443; 619 N.E.2d 692

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑