State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

Ohio Supreme Court October 13, 1993

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann, 67 Ohio St. 3d 443 (Ohio 1993)

619 N.E.2d 692

Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann
Cited By: 7 cases
Status: Published