Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 8, 1993 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
68 Ohio St. 3d 12; 623 N.E.2d 28

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered to serve a one-year suspension from the practice of law in Ohio, with such suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑