Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Payne

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Payne
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 29, 1993 · Douglas, From, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Practice, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright, Year
68 Ohio St. 3d 103; 623 N.E.2d 1191

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Payne

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the findings of the board and adopt its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, with six months of the suspension suspended.

Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. *105Moyer, C.J., and F.E. Sweeney, J., dissent and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑