Young v. Young
Young v. Young
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 679.]
YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. YOUNG, APPELLEE. [Cite as Young v. Young, 1994-Ohio-97.] Domestic relations—Child support—Order to pay child support may be enforced by means of imprisonment through contempt proceedings even after the child who is the subject of the order is emancipated. (No. 94-1220—Submitted September 13, 1994—Decided November 9, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Miami County, No. 93-CA-10. __________________ Gretchen K. Beers and Ann Ratcliff, Miami County Child Support Enforcement Agency, for appellant. Louie R. Kindell & Associates and Louie R. Kindell, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed; the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the judgment of the court of common pleas is reinstated on the authority of Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 637 N.E.2d 882. MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. __________________
Reference
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Domestic relations—Child support—Order to pay child support may be enforced by means of imprisonment through contempt proceedings even after the child who is the subject of the order is emancipated.