Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Toledo

Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 1, 1994
1994 Ohio 523

Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Toledo

Opinion

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer.

Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.

Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.

Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.

NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.

The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Citizens for Fair Taxation et al., Appellants, v. City of Toledo et al., Appellees. [Cite as Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Toledo (1994), Ohio St.3d .]

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 92-2235 -- Submitted December 14, 1993 -- Decided February 2, 1994.)

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-91-302.

Nathan & Roberts, R. Michael Frank and W. David Arnold, for appellants.

Keith A. Wilkowski, Director of Law, and Ralph J. Lewis, Assistant Director of Law, for appellees.

Barry M. Byron Co., L.P.A., Barry M. Byron and Stephen L.

Byron, urging affirmance for amici curiae, Ohio Municipal Attorneys' Association and the cities of Akron, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton and Youngstown.

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Fain, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Baird, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals William R. Baird, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J., Mike Fain, J., of the Second Appellate Distirct, sitting for Resnick, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.