Faber v. Metalweld, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
Faber v. Metalweld, Inc., 1994 Ohio 355 (Ohio 1994)

Faber v. Metalweld, Inc.

Opinion

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Faber, Admr., Appellant, v. Metalweld, Inc., Appellees, et al. [Cite as Faber v. Metalweld, Inc. (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 92-2093 -- Submitted December 8, 1993 -- Decided January 26, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 60983.

Friedman, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey H. Friedman, for appellant. Law Offices of Jan A. Saurman and Kerry Randall-Lewis, for appellee.

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.