Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 2, 1994 · Douglas, From, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Practice, Resnick, Stayed, Sweeney, Wright, Year

68 Ohio St. 3d 202; 625 N.E.2d 602

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Hill v. Niehaus (Ohio 1994)
State ex rel. Hill v. Niehaus (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the final year of the suspension stayed for a probationary period of two years, if during this period the respondent receives continuing treatment from a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist such as Dr. Siddall. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. *205Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months stayed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.