Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 2, 1994 · Douglas, From, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Practice, Resnick, Stayed, Sweeney, Wright, Year
68 Ohio St. 3d 202; 625 N.E.2d 602

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the final year of the suspension stayed for a probationary period of two years, if during this period the respondent receives continuing treatment from a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist such as Dr. Siddall. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. *205Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months stayed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑