Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Nienaber
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Holland (Ohio 2005)
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (Ohio 1997)
- In re Nienaber (Ind. 1996)
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Nienaber (Ohio 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We do not, however, agree with the recommended sanction. In the case before us, respondent certified that the expenses enumerated in his travel voucher were incurred “in the service of the County and include[d] only such expenses as were necessary in performing that service. * * * ” (Emphasis added.) In reality, however, respondent sought reimbursement from public funds of certain expenditures wholly unrelated to the defense of his client.
Finding a more severe sanction to be warranted, we hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for six months.
Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.