Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Ford v. Talley Machinery Corp.

Ford v. Talley Machinery Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 23, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
68 Ohio St. 3d 473; 628 N.E.2d 1351

Ford v. Talley Machinery Corp.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 626 N.E.2d 75.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately.

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 246-250, 626 N.E.2d 75, 79-81.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As stated in Justice Wright’s dissent in Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 246-250, 626 N.E.2d 75, 79-81, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.