Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 23, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
68 Ohio St. 3d 478; 1994 WL 73657

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact' and conclusions of law of the board. However, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law without credit for time served. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents., Douglas, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would concur with the recommendations of the board.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑