Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 23, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright
68 Ohio St. 3d 482; 628 N.E.2d 1356

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑