Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 30, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

68 Ohio St. 3d 568; 629 N.E.2d 430

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado (Ohio 1996)
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Meyer (Ohio 1999)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Meyer (Ohio 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years. The sanction is suspended and respondent is placed on probation for two years, under the conditions recommended by the board. If respondent violates any of those conditions during the probationary period, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically imposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.