Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 27, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
69 Ohio St. 3d 80; 630 N.E.2d 662

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years; after one year, respondent, upon application, will be reinstated and placed on probation for the second year with supervision by the Cuyahoga County Bar Association to *83identify and prevent recurring patterns of neglect, failure to account, and failure to properly maintain and deliver clients’ funds. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.