Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 27, 1994 · No. 93-2175 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

69 Ohio St. 3d 80; 630 N.E.2d 662

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Stidham (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years; after one year, respondent, upon application, will be reinstated and placed on probation for the second year with supervision by the Cuyahoga County Bar Association to *83identify and prevent recurring patterns of neglect, failure to account, and failure to properly maintain and deliver clients’ funds. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.