Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 4, 1994 · No. 93-1349 · Christley, Douglas, Eleventh, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
69 Ohio St. 3d 182; 631 N.E.2d 123
Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This cause is before this court upon the certification of the Court of Appeals for Lucas County that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County in Miller v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio App.2d 323, 49 O.O.2d 451, 253 N.E.2d 801.

Having examined Miller and the record in the present cause, we find that the judgments do not conflict. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 79, 630 N.E.2d 662; Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 594, 613 N.E.2d 1032; Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 601, 613 N.E.2d 1037; State v. Parobek (1990) 49 Ohio St.3d 61, 550 N.E.2d 476; State v. Radar (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 112, 548 N.E.2d 210; Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 60, 526 N.E.2d 307; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 44, 523 N.E.2d 502; State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 68, 514 N.E.2d 873.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Christley, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Judith A Christley, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.