Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 22, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

69 Ohio St. 3d 468; 633 N.E.2d 1112

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin (Ohio 1995)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin (Ohio 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin (Ohio 1995)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings and recommendation, except for the proposed credit for respondent’s interim suspension. Therefore, we find that Linda Sue Martin violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6), and she is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the last six months of that period to be stayed in favor of the probation period and conditions recommended by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.