Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 22, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
69 Ohio St. 3d 468; 633 N.E.2d 1112

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings and recommendation, except for the proposed credit for respondent’s interim suspension. Therefore, we find that Linda Sue Martin violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6), and she is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the last six months of that period to be stayed in favor of the probation period and conditions recommended by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.