Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crowley
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Disciplinary Counsel v. McNeal (Ohio 2012)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer (Ohio 2010)
- Akron Bar Assn. v. Smithern (Ohio 2010)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Brenner (Ohio 2009)
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Schwieterman (Ohio 2007)
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Crossmock (Ohio 2006)
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yajko (Ohio 1997)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Yajko (Ohio 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct. In addition, the board increased the sanction recommended by the panel because of “the calculated, deliberate manner in which Respondent conducted and concealed his fraudulent schemes, his gross abuse of a position of trust and responsibility for personal gain, the amount of the theft, the length of time over which the thefts occurred and a concern that Respondent’s testimony, offered in mitigation and justification of the thefts, instead demonstrated a fundamental lack of appreciation for lawyers’ ethical obligations to the profession and the public.”
We agree with this assessment of respondent’s misconduct and that indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction. Accordingly, James Tyner Crowley is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I would follow the recommendation of the panel and impose a two-year suspension, with one of the years being suspended on the conditions described in the majority opinion.
Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.