Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 24, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright

70 Ohio St. 3d 75; 637 N.E.2d 296

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Farah (Ohio 2010)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that Leroy Reuben Boykin be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months; however, imposition of this sanction is stayed on the conditions established by the panel and adopted by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would indefinitely suspend respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.