Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Smith v. Rudler

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 28, 1994 · Douglas, Jasko, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright

70 Ohio St. 3d 397; 639 N.E.2d 66; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2073

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Smith v. Rudler (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for consideration and application of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.