Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Smith v. Rudler

Smith v. Rudler
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 28, 1994 · Douglas, Jasko, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright
70 Ohio St. 3d 397; 639 N.E.2d 66; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2073

Smith v. Rudler

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for consideration and application of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑