Lance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Ohio Supreme Court
Lance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 70 Ohio St. 3d 487 (Ohio 1994)
639 N.E.2d 445
Douglas, Ins, Moyer, Ohio, Opinions, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright

Lance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lance v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published