McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court October 5, 1994

McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance, 70 Ohio St. 3d 488 (Ohio 1994)

639 N.E.2d 446

Douglas, Ins, Moyer, Ohio, Opinions, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Reference

Full Case Name: McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published