McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance
McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance
70 Ohio St. 3d 488; 639 N.E.2d 446
McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.
Concurring Opinion
concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.