Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Sabo v. MICO Insurance

Sabo v. MICO Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 5, 1994 · Douglas, Ins, Moyer, Ohio, Opinions, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright
70 Ohio St. 3d 492; 639 N.E.2d 448

Sabo v. MICO Insurance

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to apply Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reason stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law- announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.