Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Sabo v. MICO Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 5, 1994 · Douglas, Ins, Moyer, Ohio, Opinions, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Sweeney, Wright

70 Ohio St. 3d 492; 639 N.E.2d 448

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Critelli v. TIG Insurance (Ohio Ct. App. 1997)
Sabo v. MICO Ins. Co. (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to apply Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reason stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law- announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.