Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 23, 1994 · Douglas, Her, Moyer, Payment, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Restitution, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 20; 641 N.E.2d 184; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2587

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years with credit given for time served. As a condition to reinstatement, respondent must complete her federal probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., would also condition respondent’s reinstatement upon her full payment of restitution.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑