Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cargo

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cargo
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 7, 1994 · Douglas, Months, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Stay, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 87; 641 N.E.2d 1374

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cargo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed and respondent to be placed on probation upon the conditions that during this period: the performance of his duties be supervised by an attorney at his new firm, Reminger & Reminger; a monitoring attorney be appointed under Gov.Bar R. V(9)(B); and respondent reimburse his former firm in Mansfield the $300 paid to Kleshinski. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would suspend respondent for six months without stay.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.