Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino

Ohio Supreme Court December 7, 1994

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95 (Ohio 1994)

642 N.E.2d 342

Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on the condition that no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel during that time. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I dissent, because I would not stay respondent’s suspension of six months.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: Mahoning County Bar Association v. DiMartino
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published