Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 7, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 95; 642 N.E.2d 342

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Mahoning County Bar Association v. DiMartino (Ohio 2016)
Mahoning County Bar Association v. DiMartino (Ohio 2016)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino (Ohio 2010)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino (Ohio 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on the condition that no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel during that time. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I dissent, because I would not stay respondent’s suspension of six months.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.