Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 7, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 97; 642 N.E.2d 343

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show cause why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.