Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 7, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 97; 642 N.E.2d 343

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ross (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ross (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane (Ohio 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show cause why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.