Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 131; 642 N.E.2d 370

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Thomas (Ohio 1999)
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Meyer (Ohio 1999)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Meyer (Ohio 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath (Ohio 1997)
Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath (Ohio 1996)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Keeler (Ohio 1996)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Keeler (Ohio 1996)
In re Sprankle, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. While we agree with the two-year suspension and conditions recommended by the board, we stay only one year of said suspension, and thereafter place respondent on a one-year monitored probation. The conditions, as recommended by the board, shall apply during the full two-year suspension and probationary period. If respondent violates any of the conditions outlined by the board during the period of his probation, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically reimposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.