Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc., 71 Ohio St. 3d 166 (Ohio 1994)
642 N.E.2d 627
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Weight

Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

A discretionary appeal is allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 281, 638 N.E.2d 991.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Weight, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As stated in the concurring opinion in Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 281, 638 N.E.2d 991, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Reference

Status
Published