Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc.

Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Weight
71 Ohio St. 3d 166; 642 N.E.2d 627

Purnell v. Orthopaedic Offices, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

A discretionary appeal is allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 281, 638 N.E.2d 991.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Weight, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Concurring Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As stated in the concurring opinion in Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 281, 638 N.E.2d 991, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.