Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

State v. Hull

State v. Hull
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 23, 1994 · No. 94-2005 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 292; 643 N.E.2d 546; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 3004
State v. Hull

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to supplement the record is denied, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.