Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 391; 643 N.E.2d 1145

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert (Ohio 2011)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schmalz (Ohio 2009)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler (Ohio 2006)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kodish (Ohio 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore (Ohio 2004)
In re Ashy (La. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting. The facts as presented in this case do not merit disciplinary action. However, respondent did agree with the panel’s recommendation of a public reprimand. If there are some other facts that yielded this result, they should be revealed to this court. If not, the case should be dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.