Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

State v. Thrower

State v. Thrower
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 397; 643 N.E.2d 1149; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2931
State v. Thrower

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that the good-cause requirement denies him due process of law because he had no notice of the ninety-day filing requirement. We reject this argument and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Appellant is not entitled to special notice of changes in the law.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.